↓ Skip to main content

Characteristics of People Who Use Telephone Counseling: Findings from Secondary Analysis of a Population-Based Study

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characteristics of People Who Use Telephone Counseling: Findings from Secondary Analysis of a Population-Based Study
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10488-014-0595-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget Bassilios, Meredith Harris, Aves Middleton, Jane Gunn, Jane Pirkis

Abstract

The characteristics of people who use telephone counseling are not well understood. This secondary analysis used data from a nationally representative community survey of 8,841 Australian adults to compare callers and non-callers to telephone counseling services. Callers have a poorer clinical profile, including a higher risk of suicide, than people who do not use telephone counseling. They also use a variety of other mental health services. Repeat calls are associated with anxiety disorders, receipt of mental health care from general practitioners, and social disadvantage. All callers have a potential need for telephone counseling and further population studies that distinguish between telephone services intended to provide crisis (one-off) and ongoing counseling are warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 17%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 19 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,816,407
of 24,353,295 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#597
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,338
of 255,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#17
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,353,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.