| Title |
From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Studies, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z |
| Authors |
David Pontille, Didier Torny |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Librarian | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 27% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 23 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,722,338
of 24,715,720 outputs
Outputs from Human Studies
#14
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,714
of 257,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Studies
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,715,720 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.