↓ Skip to main content

Rare GABRA3 variants are associated with epileptic seizures, encephalopathy and dysmorphic features

Overview of attention for article published in Brain, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rare GABRA3 variants are associated with epileptic seizures, encephalopathy and dysmorphic features
Published in
Brain, October 2017
DOI 10.1093/brain/awx236
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina Elena Niturad, Dorit Lev, Vera M Kalscheuer, Agnieszka Charzewska, Julian Schubert, Tally Lerman-Sagie, Hester Y Kroes, Renske Oegema, Monica Traverso, Nicola Specchio, Maria Lassota, Jamel Chelly, Odeya Bennett-Back, Nirit Carmi, Tal Koffler-Brill, Michele Iacomino, Marina Trivisano, Giuseppe Capovilla, Pasquale Striano, Magdalena Nawara, Sylwia Rzonca, Ute Fischer, Melanie Bienek, Corinna Jensen, Hao Hu, Holger Thiele, Janine Altmüller, Roland Krause, Patrick May, Felicitas Becker, Rudi Balling, Saskia Biskup, Stefan A Haas, Peter Nürnberg, Koen L I van Gassen, Holger Lerche, Federico Zara, Snezana Maljevic, Esther Leshinsky-Silver

Abstract

Genetic epilepsies are caused by mutations in a range of different genes, many of them encoding ion channels, receptors or transporters. While the number of detected variants and genes increased dramatically in the recent years, pleiotropic effects have also been recognized, revealing that clinical syndromes with various degrees of severity arise from a single gene, a single mutation, or from different mutations showing similar functional defects. Accordingly, several genes coding for GABAA receptor subunits have been linked to a spectrum of benign to severe epileptic disorders and it was shown that a loss of function presents the major correlated pathomechanism. Here, we identified six variants in GABRA3 encoding the α3-subunit of the GABAA receptor. This gene is located on chromosome Xq28 and has not been previously associated with human disease. Five missense variants and one microduplication were detected in four families and two sporadic cases presenting with a range of epileptic seizure types, a varying degree of intellectual disability and developmental delay, sometimes with dysmorphic features or nystagmus. The variants co-segregated mostly but not completely with the phenotype in the families, indicating in some cases incomplete penetrance, involvement of other genes, or presence of phenocopies. Overall, males were more severely affected and there were three asymptomatic female mutation carriers compared to only one male without a clinical phenotype. X-chromosome inactivation studies could not explain the phenotypic variability in females. Three detected missense variants are localized in the extracellular GABA-binding NH2-terminus, one in the M2-M3 linker and one in the M4 transmembrane segment of the α3-subunit. Functional studies in Xenopus laevis oocytes revealed a variable but significant reduction of GABA-evoked anion currents for all mutants compared to wild-type receptors. The degree of current reduction correlated partially with the phenotype. The microduplication disrupted GABRA3 expression in fibroblasts of the affected patient. In summary, our results reveal that rare loss-of-function variants in GABRA3 increase the risk for a varying combination of epilepsy, intellectual disability/developmental delay and dysmorphic features, presenting in some pedigrees with an X-linked inheritance pattern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Master 8 10%
Other 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 16 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Psychology 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2018.
All research outputs
#450,002
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from Brain
#368
of 7,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,610
of 333,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain
#9
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.