You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How are decisions on care services for people with dementia made and experienced? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of recent empirical findings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Psychogeriatrics, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s104161021400132x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annika Taghizadeh Larsson, Johannes H. Österholm |
| Abstract |
ABSTRACT Background: During recent decades, there has been a growing recognition that people cannot be assumed incapable of making decisions about their own care solely on the basis of a dementia diagnosis and international agreements and legislative changes have strengthened the formal right for people with dementia to participate in decisions on care services. This raises important questions about how these decisions are currently made and experienced in practice. In this review, we address this question and highlight directions for further research. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 18 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,202,382
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from International Psychogeriatrics
#779
of 1,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,706
of 226,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Psychogeriatrics
#14
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.