↓ Skip to main content

Temporal constraints on predation risk assessment in a changing world

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal constraints on predation risk assessment in a changing world
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas P. Chivers, Ryan A. Ramasamy, Mark I. McCormick, Sue-Ann Watson, Ulrike E. Siebeck, Maud C.O. Ferrari

Abstract

Habitat degradation takes various forms and likely represents the most significant threat to our global biodiversity. Recently, we have seen considerable attention paid to increasing global CO2 emissions which lead to ocean acidification (OA). Other stressors, such as changing levels of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), also impact biodiversity but have received much less attention in the recent past. Here we examine fundamental questions about temporal aspects of risk assessment by coral reef damselfish and provide critical insights into how OA and UVR influence this assessment. Chemical cues released during a predator attack provide a rich source of information that other prey animals use to mediate their risk of predation and are the basis of the majority of trait-mediated indirect interactions in aquatic communities. However, we have surprisingly limited information about temporal aspects of risk assessment because we lack knowledge about how long chemical cues persist after they are released into the environment. Here, we showed that under ambient CO2 conditions (~385μatm), alarm cues of ambon damselfish (Pomacentrus amboinensis) did not degrade within 30min in the absence of ultraviolet radiation (UVR), but were degraded within 15min when the CO2 was increased to ~905μatm. In experiments that used filters to eliminate UVR, we found minimal degradation of alarm cues within 30min, whereas under ambient UVR conditions, alarm cues were completely degraded within 15min. Moreover, in the presence of both UVR and elevated CO2, alarm cues were broken down within 5min. Our results highlight that alarm cues degrade surprisingly quickly under natural conditions and that anthropogenic changes have the potential to dramatically change rates of cue degradation in the wild. This has considerable implications for risk assessment and consequently the importance of trait-mediated indirect interactions in coral-reef communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 41%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#3,201,105
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#4,241
of 29,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,620
of 260,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#14
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.