↓ Skip to main content

Randomized Controlled Caregiver Mediated Joint Engagement Intervention for Toddlers with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
531 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
591 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Randomized Controlled Caregiver Mediated Joint Engagement Intervention for Toddlers with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-0955-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Connie Kasari, Amanda C. Gulsrud, Connie Wong, Susan Kwon, Jill Locke

Abstract

This study aimed to determine if a joint attention intervention would result in greater joint engagement between caregivers and toddlers with autism. The intervention consisted of 24 caregiver-mediated sessions with follow-up 1 year later. Compared to caregivers and toddlers randomized to the waitlist control group the immediate treatment (IT) group made significant improvements in targeted areas of joint engagement. The IT group demonstrated significant improvements with medium to large effect sizes in their responsiveness to joint attention and their diversity of functional play acts after the intervention with maintenance of these skills 1 year post-intervention. These are among the first randomized controlled data to suggest that short-term parent-mediated interventions can have important effects on core impairments in toddlers with autism. Clinical Trials #: NCT00065910.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 591 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 580 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 18%
Student > Master 90 15%
Student > Bachelor 63 11%
Researcher 61 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 7%
Other 99 17%
Unknown 127 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 198 34%
Social Sciences 75 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 52 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 6%
Linguistics 10 2%
Other 65 11%
Unknown 153 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,145,566
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#432
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,075
of 171,580 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#6
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,580 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.