↓ Skip to main content

Information gaps in understanding the effects of noise on fishes and invertebrates

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
Title
Information gaps in understanding the effects of noise on fishes and invertebrates
Published in
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11160-014-9369-3
Authors

Anthony D. Hawkins, Ann E. Pembroke, Arthur N. Popper

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 336 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 58 17%
Student > Bachelor 50 15%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 74 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 37%
Environmental Science 74 22%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 4%
Engineering 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 89 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,731,542
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#144
of 659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,406
of 259,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them