| Title |
Feasibility of a machine vs free weight strength training program and its effects on physical performance in nursing home residents: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-017-0830-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bettina Johnen, Nadja Schott |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Researcher | 11 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 79 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,224,212
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#508
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,810
of 328,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.