↓ Skip to main content

Importance of Consistent Datasets in Musculoskeletal Modelling: A Study of the Hand and Wrist

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Importance of Consistent Datasets in Musculoskeletal Modelling: A Study of the Hand and Wrist
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10439-017-1936-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benjamin Goislard De Monsabert, Dafydd Edwards, Darshan Shah, Angela Kedgley

Abstract

Hand musculoskeletal models provide a valuable insight into the loads withstood by the upper limb; however, their development remains challenging because there are few datasets describing both the musculoskeletal geometry and muscle morphology from the elbow to the finger tips. Clinical imaging, optical motion capture and microscopy were used to create a dataset from a single specimen. Subsequently, a musculoskeletal model of the wrist was developed based on these data to estimate muscle tensions and to demonstrate the potential of the provided parameters. Tendon excursions and moment arms predicted by this model were in agreement with previously reported experimental data. When simulating a flexion-extension motion, muscle forces reached 90 N among extensors and a co-contraction of flexors, amounting to 62.6 N, was estimated by the model. Two alternative musculoskeletal models were also created based on anatomical data available in the literature to illustrate the effect of combining incomplete datasets. Compared to the initial model, the intensities and load sharing of the muscles estimated by the two alternative models differed by up to 180% for a single muscle. This confirms the importance of using a single source of anatomical data when developing such models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 48%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 20 30%