↓ Skip to main content

Stream carbon and nitrogen supplements during leaf litter decomposition: contrasting patterns for two foundation species

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Stream carbon and nitrogen supplements during leaf litter decomposition: contrasting patterns for two foundation species
Published in
Oecologia, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00442-014-3063-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ada Pastor, Zacchaeus G. Compson, Paul Dijkstra, Joan L. Riera, Eugènia Martí, Francesc Sabater, Bruce A. Hungate, Jane C. Marks

Abstract

Leaf litter decomposition plays a major role in nutrient dynamics in forested streams. The chemical composition of litter affects its processing by microorganisms, which obtain nutrients from litter and from the water column. The balance of these fluxes is not well known, because they occur simultaneously and thus are difficult to quantify separately. Here, we examined C and N flow from streamwater and leaf litter to microbial biofilms during decomposition. We used isotopically enriched leaves ((13)C and (15)N) from two riparian foundation tree species: fast-decomposing Populus fremontii and slow-decomposing Populus angustifolia, which differed in their concentration of recalcitrant compounds. We adapted the isotope pool dilution method to estimate gross elemental fluxes into litter microbes. Three key findings emerged: litter type strongly affected biomass and stoichiometry of microbial assemblages growing on litter; the proportion of C and N in microorganisms derived from the streamwater, as opposed to the litter, did not differ between litter types, but increased throughout decomposition; gross immobilization of N from the streamwater was higher for P. fremontii compared to P. angustifolia, probably as a consequence of the higher microbial biomass on P. fremontii. In contrast, gross immobilization of C from the streamwater was higher for P. angustifolia, suggesting that dissolved organic C in streamwater was used as an additional energy source by microbial assemblages growing on slow-decomposing litter. These results indicate that biofilms on decomposing litter have specific element requirements driven by litter characteristics, which might have implications for whole-stream nutrient retention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 21%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Professor 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 35%
Environmental Science 29 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,718,164
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#726
of 4,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,134
of 243,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.