↓ Skip to main content

Comparisons of Dose-Volume Histograms for Proton-Beam versus 3-D Conformal X-Ray Therapy in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions
Title
Comparisons of Dose-Volume Histograms for Proton-Beam versus 3-D Conformal X-Ray Therapy in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00066-009-1923-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Changlu Wang, Hidetsugu Nakayama, Shinji Sugahara, Takeji Sakae, Koichi Tokuuye

Abstract

Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were reviewed to determine if there is an advantage of the two modalities when treating patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,306,466
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#362
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,678
of 78,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.