You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of waiting: A meta-analysis of wait-list control groups in trials for tinnitus distress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychosomatic Research, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.12.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo Hesser, Cornelia Weise, Winfried Rief, Gerhard Andersson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 31% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,440,254
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#724
of 3,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,575
of 123,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosomatic Research
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.