↓ Skip to main content

Drought-induced expression of aquaporin genes in leaves of two common bean cultivars differing in tolerance to drought stress

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Plant Research, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Drought-induced expression of aquaporin genes in leaves of two common bean cultivars differing in tolerance to drought stress
Published in
Journal of Plant Research, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10265-017-0920-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mateja Zupin, Aleš Sedlar, Marjetka Kidrič, Vladimir Meglič

Abstract

Aquaporin proteins are part of the complex response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to drought which affects the quality and quantity of yield of this important crop. To better understand the role of aquaporins in common bean, drought-induced gene expression of several aquaporins was determined in two cultivars, the more drought tolerant Tiber and the less tolerant Starozagorski čern. The two bean cultivars were selected among 16 European genotypes based on the tolerance to drought determined by time needed for plants to wilt after withholding irrigation and yield at harvest. The expression patterns of two plasma membrane intrinsic proteins, PvPIP1;2 and PvPIP2;7, and two tonoplast intrinsic proteins, PvTIP1;1 and PvTIP4;1 in leaves of 21 day old plants were determined by RT-qPCR in both cultivars under three degrees of drought stress, and under rehydration and control conditions. Gene expression of all four examined aquaporins was down-regulated in drought stressed plants. After rehydration it returned to the level of control plants or was even higher. The responses of PvPIP2;7 and PvTIP1;1 during drought and rehydration were particularly pronounced. The gene expression of PvPIP2;7 and PvTIP4;1 during drought was cultivar specific, with greater down-regulation of these two aquaporins in drought tolerant Tiber. Under drought stress the relative water content and water potential of leaves were higher in Tiber than in Starozagorski plants. The differences in these physiological parameters indicate greater prevention of water loss in Tiber during drought, which may be associated with rapid and adequate down-regulation of aquaporins. These results suggest that the ability of plants to conserve water during drought stress involves timely and sufficient down-regulation of gene expression of specific aquaporins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2017.
All research outputs
#18,573,839
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#667
of 835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,338
of 308,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#22
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 835 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.