You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation Science in Cancer Prevention and Control: A Framework for Research and Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0472 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudha Sivaram, Michael A Sanchez, Barbara K Rimer, Jonathan M Samet, Russell E Glasgow |
| Abstract |
Implementation Science is a set of tools, principles and methodologies that can be used to bring scientific evidence into action, improve health care quality and delivery and improve public health. As the burden of cancer increases in low- and middle-income countries, it is important to plan cancer control programs that are both evidence-based and delivered in ways that are feasible, cost-effective, contextually appropriate and sustainable. This review presents a framework for using implementation science for cancer control planning and implementation and discusses potential areas of focus for research and programs in low and middle-income countries interested in integrating research into practice and policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 35% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#2,054
of 4,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,724
of 274,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#41
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.