↓ Skip to main content

Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?

Overview of attention for article published in Biology & Philosophy, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Are Random Drift and Natural Selection Conceptually Distinct?
Published in
Biology & Philosophy, January 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1012990800358
Authors

Roberta L. Millstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 49%
Philosophy 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Linguistics 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#577
of 663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,252
of 122,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.