| Title |
Resuscitation of patients with septic shock: please “mind the gap”!
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-013-2998-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
B. Vallet, M. R. Pinsky, M. Cecconi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| Mexico | 5 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 5 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 40 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 15% |
| Scientists | 8 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 40 | 21% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 36 | 19% |
| Unknown | 37 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 69% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2022.
All research outputs
#760,391
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#705
of 5,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,777
of 208,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.