You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Agreement between TOAST and CCS ischemic stroke classification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1212/wnl.0000000000000942 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick F McArdle, Steven J Kittner, Hakan Ay, Robert D Brown, James F Meschia, Tatjana Rundek, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller, Daniel Woo, Gunnar Andsberg, Alessandro Biffi, David A Brenner, John W Cole, Roderick Corriveau, Paul I W de Bakker, Hossein Delavaran, Martin Dichgans, Raji P Grewal, Katrina Gwinn, Mohammed Huq, Christina Jern, Jordi Jimenez-Conde, Katarina Jood, Robert C Kaplan, Petra Katschnig, Michael Katsnelson, Daniel L Labovitz, Robin Lemmens, Linxin Li, Arne Lindgren, Hugh S Markus, Leema R Peddareddygari, Annie Pedersén, Joanna Pera, Petra Redfors, Jaume Roquer, Jonathan Rosand, Natalia S Rost, Peter M Rothwell, Ralph L Sacco, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Cathie Sudlow, Vincent Thijs, Steffen Tiedt, Raffaella Valenti, Bradford B Worrall |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to assess the level of agreement between stroke subtype classifications made using the Trial of Org 10172 Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) and Causative Classification of Stroke (CCS) systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Brazil | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Colombia | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 26% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,444,434
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Neurology
#8,456
of 21,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,969
of 263,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology
#106
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.