You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antimycobacterial activity of selected medicinal plants traditionally used in Sudan to treat infectious diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jep.2014.09.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadir Abuzeid, Sadaf Kalsum, Richin John Koshy, Marie Larsson, Mikaela Glader, Henrik Andersson, Johanna Raffetseder, Elsje Pienaar, Daniel Eklund, Muddathir S. Alhassan, Haidar A. AlGadir, Waleed S. Koko, Thomas Schön, M. Ahmed Mesaik, Omer M. Abdalla, Asaad Khalid, Maria Lerm |
| Abstract |
The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis underscores the need for continuous development of new and efficient methods to determine the susceptibility of isolates of M. tuberculosis in the search for novel antimycobacterial agents. Natural products constitute an important source of new drugs, and design and implementation of antimycobacterial susceptibility testing methods are necessary to evaluate the different extracts and compounds. In this study we have explored the antimycobacterial properties of 50 ethanolic extracts from different parts of 46 selected medicinal plants traditionally used in Sudan to treat infectious diseases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 28% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#5,808
of 7,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,570
of 263,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#64
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.