↓ Skip to main content

Engineering a carotenoid-binding site in Dokdonia sp. PRO95 Na+-translocating rhodopsin by a single amino acid substitution

Overview of attention for article published in Photosynthesis Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Engineering a carotenoid-binding site in Dokdonia sp. PRO95 Na+-translocating rhodopsin by a single amino acid substitution
Published in
Photosynthesis Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11120-017-0453-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Viktor A. Anashkin, Yulia V. Bertsova, Adalyat M. Mamedov, Mahir D. Mamedov, Alexander M. Arutyunyan, Alexander A. Baykov, Alexander V. Bogachev

Abstract

Light-driven H(+), Cl(-) and Na(+) rhodopsin pumps all use a covalently bound retinal molecule to capture light energy. Some H(+)-pumping rhodopsins (xanthorhodopsins; XRs) additionally contain a carotenoid antenna for light absorption. Comparison of the available primary and tertiary structures of rhodopsins pinpointed a single Thr residue (Thr216) that presumably prevents carotenoid binding to Na(+)-pumping rhodopsins (NaRs). We replaced this residue in Dokdonia sp. PRO95 NaR with Gly, which is found in the corresponding position in XRs, and produced a variant rhodopsin in a ketocarotenoid-synthesising Escherichia coli strain. Unlike wild-type NaR, the isolated variant protein contained the tightly bound carotenoids canthaxanthin and echinenone. These carotenoids were visible in the absorption, circular dichroism and fluorescence excitation spectra of the Thr216Gly-substituted NaR, which indicates their function as a light-harvesting antenna. The amino acid substitution and the bound carotenoids did not affect the NaR photocycle. Our findings suggest that the antenna function was recently lost during NaR evolution but can be easily restored by site-directed mutagenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 18%
Chemistry 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,723,164
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Photosynthesis Research
#520
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,539
of 323,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photosynthesis Research
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.