↓ Skip to main content

Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Community‐Based Participatory Research to Enhance Mental Health Services

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Community Psychology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Stakeholders’ Perspectives on Community‐Based Participatory Research to Enhance Mental Health Services
Published in
American Journal of Community Psychology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10464-014-9677-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew D. Case, Ronald Byrd, Eddrena Claggett, Sandra DeVeaux, Reno Perkins, Cindy Huang, Michael J. Sernyak, Jeanne L. Steiner, Robert Cole, Donna M. LaPaglia, Margaret Bailey, Candace Buchanan, Avon Johnson, Joy S. Kaufman

Abstract

Historically, consumers of mental health services have not been given meaningful roles in research and change efforts related to the services they use. This is quickly changing as scholars and a growing number of funding bodies now call for greater consumer involvement in mental health services research and improvement. Amidst these calls, community-based participatory research (CBPR) has emerged as an approach which holds unique promise for capitalizing on consumer involvement in mental health services research and change. Yet, there have been few discussions of the value added by this approach above and beyond that of traditional means of inquiry and enhancement in adult mental health services. The purpose of this paper is to add to this discussion an understanding of potential multilevel and multifaceted benefits associated with consumer-involved CBPR. This is accomplished through presenting the first-person accounts of four stakeholder groups who were part of a consumer-involved CBPR project purposed to improve the services of a local community mental health center. We present these accounts with the hope that by illustrating the unique outcomes associated with CBPR, there will be invigorated interest in CBPR as a vehicle for consumer involvement in adult mental health services research and enhancement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 79 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 33%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 26%
Social Sciences 18 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,093,282
of 24,698,625 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Community Psychology
#1,010
of 1,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,359
of 257,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Community Psychology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,625 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.