| Title |
Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-008-9113-6 |
| Authors |
Benjamin K. Sovacool |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 26% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#2,255,783
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#99
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,411
of 84,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them