↓ Skip to main content

Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin Prevent Recurrence of HCV Infection After Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label Study

Overview of attention for article published in Gastroenterology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
patent
9 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
305 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sofosbuvir and Ribavirin Prevent Recurrence of HCV Infection After Liver Transplantation: An Open-Label Study
Published in
Gastroenterology, September 2014
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael P. Curry, Xavier Forns, Raymond T. Chung, Norah A. Terrault, Robert Brown, Jonathan M. Fenkel, Fredric Gordon, Jacqueline O’Leary, Alexander Kuo, Thomas Schiano, Gregory Everson, Eugene Schiff, Alex Befeler, Edward Gane, Sammy Saab, John G. McHutchison, G. Mani Subramanian, William T. Symonds, Jill Denning, Lindsay McNair, Sarah Arterburn, Evguenia Svarovskaia, Dilip Moonka, Nezam Afdhal

Abstract

Patients with detectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA at the time of liver transplantation universally experience recurrent HCV infection. Antiviral treatment before transplantation can prevent HCV recurrence, but existing interferon-based regimens are poorly tolerated and are either ineffective or contraindicated in most patients. We performed a trial to determine whether sofosbuvir and ribavirin treatment before liver transplantation could prevent HCV recurrence afterward.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 21 12%
Student > Master 19 11%
Other 34 20%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#465,162
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#382
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,599
of 263,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.