↓ Skip to main content

Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK Efflux Systems of Acinetobacter baumannii Compared with Those of the AcrAB-TolC System of Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
534 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17506 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Properties of AdeABC and AdeIJK Efflux Systems of Acinetobacter baumannii Compared with Those of the AcrAB-TolC System of Escherichia coli
Published in
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, September 2014
DOI 10.1128/aac.03728-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Etsuko Sugawara, Hiroshi Nikaido

Abstract

Acinetobacter baumannii contains RND-family efflux systems, AdeABC and AdeIJK, which pump out a wide range of antimicrobial compounds as judged from MIC changes occurring upon deletion of responsible genes. However, these studies may miss changes because of the high backgrounds generated by the remaining pumps and by β-lactamases, and it is unclear how the activities of these pumps compare quantitatively with those of the well-studied AcrAB-TolC system of Escherichia coli. We expressed adeABC and adeIJK of A. baumannii, as well as E. coli acrAB, in an E. coli host deleted for acrAB. A. baumannii pumps were functional in E. coli, and MIC changes observed largely confirmed the substrate range already reported, with important differences. Thus AdeABC system pumped out all β-lactams, an activity that was often missed in deletion studies. When the expression level of the pump genes was adjusted to a similar level for a comparison with AcrAB-TolC, we found that both A. baumannii efflux systems pumped out a wide range of compounds, but AdeABC was less effective than AcrAB-TolC in the extrusion of lipophilic β-lactams, novobiocin, and ethidium bromide, although it was more effective in tetracycline efflux. AdeIJK was remarkably more effective than a similar level of AcrAB-TolC in the efflux of β-lactams, novobiocin, and ethidium bromide, although less so in the efflux of erythromycin. These results thus allow us to compare these efflux systems on a quantitative basis, if we can assume that the heterologous systems are fully functional in the E. coli host.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17,506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 <1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Germany 10 <1%
Japan 10 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Brazil 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 5 <1%
Mexico 4 <1%
Other 43 <1%
Unknown 17392 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2244 13%
Student > Master 1904 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1561 9%
Researcher 1067 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 711 4%
Other 2489 14%
Unknown 7530 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 1250 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 971 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 948 5%
Social Sciences 692 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 600 3%
Other 5068 29%
Unknown 7977 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,322,312
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#2,250
of 15,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,351
of 262,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
#19
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.