Title |
Attributable causes of breast cancer and ovarian cancer in China: Reproductive factors, oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11670-012-0009-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Li Li, Jia Ji, Jian-bing Wang, Mayineur Niyazi, You-lin Qiao, Paolo Boffetta |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Professor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 33% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,176,642
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Cancer Research
#3
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,443
of 249,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Cancer Research
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them