↓ Skip to main content

The Link Between Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Model for Depression and Vascular Inflammation?

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The Link Between Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Model for Depression and Vascular Inflammation?
Published in
Inflammation, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10753-014-9867-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tuğçe Demirtaş, Tijen Utkan, Ayşe Karson, Yusufhan Yazır, Dilek Bayramgürler, Nejat Gacar

Abstract

Inflammation has been suggested to be associated with stress-induced depression and cardiovascular dysfunction. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a major cytokine in the activation of neuroendocrine, immune, and behavioral responses. In this study, we investigated the effects of infliximab (a TNF-α inhibitor) on endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity, systemic blood pressure, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) immunoreactivity in the unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) model of depression in rats. There was no significant change between all groups in the systemic blood pressure. In UCMS, endothelium-dependent relaxation of the smooth muscle in response to carbachol was significantly decreased with 50 % maximal response (E max) and pD2 values compared with the controls. Infliximab was able to reverse this UCMS effect. Relaxation in response to the nitric oxide (NO) donor sodium nitroprusside and papaverine and KCl-induced contractile responses was similar between groups. In UCMS, decreased expression of eNOS was detected. Moreover, there was no significant change in UCMS + infliximab group with respect to control rats. Our results suggest that tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) could be a major mediator of vascular dysfunction associated with UCMS, leading to decreased expression of eNOS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 6 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation
#708
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,384
of 220,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation
#16
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.