| Title |
LotuS: an efficient and user-friendly OTU processing pipeline
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2049-2618-2-30 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Falk Hildebrand, Raul Tadeo, Anita Yvonne Voigt, Peer Bork, Jeroen Raes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 24% |
| United States | 5 | 20% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Scientists | 10 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Estonia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 77 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 110 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 25 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 10% |
| Unknown | 55 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,178,931
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#863
of 1,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,450
of 266,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.