| Title |
Earth as a Tool for Astrobiology—A European Perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-017-0369-1 |
| Authors |
Zita Martins, Hervé Cottin, Julia Michelle Kotler, Nathalie Carrasco, Charles S. Cockell, Rosa de la Torre Noetzel, René Demets, Jean-Pierre de Vera, Louis d’Hendecourt, Pascale Ehrenfreund, Andreas Elsaesser, Bernard Foing, Silvano Onofri, Richard Quinn, Elke Rabbow, Petra Rettberg, Antonio J. Ricco, Klaus Slenzka, Fabien Stalport, Inge L. ten Kate, Jack J. W. A. van Loon, Frances Westall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 144 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,934,939
of 25,388,177 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#494
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,799
of 329,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.