↓ Skip to main content

Detection of respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus in healthy infants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Detection of respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus in healthy infants
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1695-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kohei Hasegawa, Rachel W. Linnemann, Vasanthi Avadhanula, Jonathan M. Mansbach, Pedro A. Piedra, James E. Gern, Carlos A. Camargo

Abstract

Despite the research importance of rhinovirus detection in asymptomatic healthy infants, the literature remains sparse. To investigate the prevalence of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and rhinovirus (and its species). We conducted a cross-sectional study of 110 healthy, non-hospitalized infants without acute illness at an academic medical center from November 2013 through May 2014. We tested nasal swab specimens by using polymerase chain reaction and genetic sequencing. Overall, the median age was 3.8 months (IQR 2.0-5.1 months), 56 % were male, and 90 % were born >37 weeks. RSV was detected in nasal swabs from infants (1.8 %). By contrast, rhinovirus was detected in nasal swabs from 16 infants (14.5 %). Molecular typing assay revealed rhinovirus species: six rhinovirus-A (5.5 %), one rhinovirus-B (0.9 %), eight rhinovirus-C (7.3 %), and one untypeable (0.9 %). In this cross-sectional study of healthy, community-based infants, RSV was rare (<2 %) in nasal swabs, while rhinovirus was detected in 14.5 % with a predominance of rhinovirus-A and -C. These finding are important for understanding the clinical significance of rhinovirus detection among infants hospitalized for bronchiolitis.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 18%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 26%