↓ Skip to main content

Locally and remotely forced atmospheric circulation anomalies of Ningaloo Niño/Niña

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Locally and remotely forced atmospheric circulation anomalies of Ningaloo Niño/Niña
Published in
Climate Dynamics, January 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00382-013-2044-x
Authors

Tomoki Tozuka, Takahito Kataoka, Toshio Yamagata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 22%
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 57%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Chemistry 1 2%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2014.
All research outputs
#18,379,018
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,202
of 4,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,783
of 304,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#32
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.