↓ Skip to main content

The determinants of service complexity in children with intellectual disabilities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The determinants of service complexity in children with intellectual disabilities
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1111/jir.12423
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. L. Stewart, K. Falah Hassani, J. Poss, J. Hirdes

Abstract

To date, little is known about the predictors of healthcare service utilisation in children with intellectual disability (ID). The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with service complexity in children with ID in Ontario, Canada. The population of this cross-sectional study consisted of 330 children with ID ages 4 to 18 years who accessed mental health services from November of 2012 to June of 2016 in four agencies. All participants completed the interRAI Child and Youth Mental Health and Developmental Disability Assessment Instrument, which is a semi-structured clinician-rated assessment that covers a range of common issues in children with ID. The outcome of this study was a service complexity variable based on (1) mental health service utilisation including any services provided to the child and (2) the management involved in providing that care. Eight individual items were summed, resulting in a scale that ranged from 0 to 8. Scores were then dichotomised into two groups: a score of 0-2 identified children with a low service complexity and a score of 3 or higher identified children with a high service complexity. After adjustment for other covariates, gender was not associated with service complexity. Children aged 11-14 years and children with autism spectrum disorder used over twofold higher levels of service complexity than children aged equal to or less than 10 years or children with other causes of ID. Moreover, victims of bullying, high scores on the family functioning scale or learning or communication disorder were associated with greater service complexity. The findings of this study indicate that a variety of factors are related to service complexity ranged from children's nonclinical (age and experiences of bullying) to clinical (e.g. aggression, learning/communication problems and autism spectrum disorder) characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 9%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 51 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,392,859
of 24,525,936 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#550
of 1,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,100
of 329,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#20
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,492 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.