| Title |
An overview of the “Three-North” Shelterbelt project in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forest Science and Practice, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11632-012-0108-3 |
| Authors |
Miao-miao Li, An-tian Liu, Chun-jing Zou, Wen-duo Xu, Hideyuki Shimizu, Kai-yun Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,057,728
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Forest Science and Practice
#1
of 13 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,614
of 254,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forest Science and Practice
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one scored the same or higher as 12 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them