You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Juvenile fish response to wetland inundation: how antecedent conditions can inform environmental flow policies for native fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12342 |
| Authors |
Leah S. Beesley, Daniel C. Gwinn, Amina Price, Alison J. King, Ben Gawne, John D. Koehn, Daryl L. Nielsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 26% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,927,964
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,688
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,278
of 261,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#38
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.