↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The case for DNA methylation based molecular profiling to improve diagnostic accuracy for central nervous system embryonal tumors (not otherwise specified) in adults
Published in
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, October 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Central nervous system primitive neuro-ectodermal tumors (CNS-PNETs), have recently been re-classified in the most recent 2016 WHO Classification into a standby catch all category, "CNS Embryonal Tumor, not otherwise specified" (CNS embryonal tumor, NOS) based on epigenetic, biologic and histopathologic criteria. CNS embryonal tumors (NOS) are a rare, histologically and molecularly heterogeneous group of tumors that predominantly affect children, and occasionally adults. Diagnosis of this entity continues to be challenging and the ramifications of misdiagnosis of this aggressive class of brain tumors are significant. We report the case of a 45-year-old woman who was diagnosed with a central nervous system embryonal tumor (NOS) based on immunohistochemical analysis of the patient's tumor at diagnosis. However, later genome-wide methylation profiling of the diagnostic tumor undertaken to guide treatment, revealed characteristics most consistent with IDH-mutant astrocytoma. DNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of IDH1 and ATRX mutations resulting in a revised diagnosis of high-grade small cell astrocytoma, and the implementation of a less aggressive treatment regime tailored more appropriately to the patient's tumor type. This case highlights the inadequacy of histology alone for the diagnosis of brain tumours and the utility of methylation profiling and integrated genomic analysis for the diagnostic verification of adults with suspected CNS embryonal tumor (NOS), and is consistent with the increasing realization in the field that a combined diagnostic approach based on clinical, histopathological and molecular data is required to more accurately distinguish brain tumor subtypes and inform more effective therapy.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 16%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 24 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
#1,235
of 2,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,694
of 332,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
#17
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,431 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.