You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incorporating population viability models into species status assessment and listing decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Global Ecology and Conservation, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.09.004 |
| Authors |
Conor P. McGowan, Nathan Allan, Jeff Servoss, Shaula Hedwall, Brian Wooldridge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 71% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 29% |
| Researcher | 12 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 7 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 25% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,136,697
of 23,005,189 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#661
of 1,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,772
of 322,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,005,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.