↓ Skip to main content

American Association for Cancer Research

Epidemiologic and Molecular Prognostic Review of Glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
953 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1439 Mendeley
Title
Epidemiologic and Molecular Prognostic Review of Glioblastoma
Published in
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, September 2014
DOI 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jigisha P. Thakkar, Therese A. Dolecek, Craig Horbinski, Quinn T. Ostrom, Donita D. Lightner, Jill S. Barnholtz-Sloan, John L. Villano

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary central nervous system malignancy with a median survival of 15 months. The average incidence rate of GBM is 3.19/100,000 population, and the median age of diagnosis is 64 years. Incidence is higher in men and individuals of white race and non-Hispanic ethnicity. Many genetic and environmental factors have been studied in GBM, but the majority are sporadic, and no risk factor accounting for a large proportion of GBMs has been identified. However, several favorable clinical prognostic factors are identified, including younger age at diagnosis, cerebellar location, high performance status, and maximal tumor resection. GBMs comprise of primary and secondary subtypes, which evolve through different genetic pathways, affect patients at different ages, and have differences in outcomes. We report the current epidemiology of GBM with new data from the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States 2006 to 2010 as well as demonstrate and discuss trends in incidence and survival. We also provide a concise review on molecular markers in GBM that have helped distinguish biologically similar subtypes of GBM and have prognostic and predictive value. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 23(10); 1-12. ©2014 AACR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 1432 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 211 15%
Student > Master 190 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 164 11%
Researcher 120 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 99 7%
Other 168 12%
Unknown 487 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 249 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 242 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 79 5%
Neuroscience 79 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 66 5%
Other 186 13%
Unknown 538 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#814,604
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#302
of 4,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,534
of 264,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
#10
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.