↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of three kinds of multimodel ensemble forecast techniques based on the TIGGE data

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Meteorological Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of three kinds of multimodel ensemble forecast techniques based on the TIGGE data
Published in
Journal of Meteorological Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13351-012-0104-5
Authors

Xiefei Zhi, Haixia Qi, Yongqing Bai, Chunze Lin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Student > Master 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Postgraduate 2 13%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 31%
Engineering 4 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Environmental Science 2 13%
Unknown 3 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Meteorological Research
#37
of 46 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,898
of 182,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Meteorological Research
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.