| Title |
Injuries in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Study to Explore Early Development (SEED)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-017-3337-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn DiGuiseppi, Susan E. Levy, Katherine R. Sabourin, Gnakub N. Soke, Steven Rosenberg, Li-Ching Lee, Eric Moody, Laura A. Schieve |
| Abstract |
This study examined caregiver-reported medically-attended injuries among 30-68 month old children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to general population (POP) and non-ASD developmental disorders (DD) controls in the Study to Explore Early Development. Injuries were common in ASD cases (32.3%) as well as POP (30.2%) and DD (27.8%) controls; most resulted in an emergency visit or hospitalization. After accounting for sociodemographic, health, IQ and behavior differences, odds of injury in ASD cases were significantly higher than DD controls but similar to POP controls. Attention problems mediated the relationships. Clinicians caring for children with both ASD and attention problems should consider providing targeted safety advice. Differences in injury risk between children with ASD vs. other developmental disorders need further study. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 23% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 14% |
| Mexico | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 91% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,800,190
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,219
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,408
of 334,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#36
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.