↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive changes with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in non-demented older adults with low omega-3 index

Overview of attention for article published in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive changes with omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in non-demented older adults with low omega-3 index
Published in
The journal of nutrition, health & aging, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12603-017-0957-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudie Hooper, P. de Souto Barreto, N. Coley, C. Cantet, M. Cesari, S. Andrieu, B. Vellas, MAPT/DSA Study Group

Abstract

To investigate the changes in specific domains of cognitive function in older adults reporting subjective memory complaints with a low omega-3 index receiving omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation or placebo. This is a secondary exploratory analysis of the Multidomain Alzheimer Preventive Trial (MAPT) using subjects randomized to the n-3 PUFA supplementation or placebo group. French community dwellers aged 70 or over reporting subjective memory complaints, but free from clinical dementia. A subgroup of MAPT subjects in the lowest quartile of omega-3 index distribution with baseline values ≤ 4.83 % (n = 183). The n-3 PUFA supplementation group consumed a daily dose of DHA (800 mg) and EPA (a maximum amount of 225 mg) for 3 years. The placebo group received identical capsules comprising liquid paraffin oil. Linear mixed-model repeated-measures analyses were used including baseline, 6, 12, 24 and 36-month follow-up data to assess between-group differences in the change in eight cognitive tests over 36 months. There was less decline on the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) in the n-3 PUFA supplementation group compared to placebo (p = 0.009; between group mean difference over 36 months, 2.3; 95% CI, 0.6,4.0). No significant differences for any of the other cognitive tests were found, including other tests of executive functioning, although, numerically all results were in favour of the n-3 PUFA supplementation. We found some evidence that n-3 PUFAs might be beneficial for the maintenance of executive functioning in older adults at risk of dementia with low omega-3 index, but this exploratory finding requires further confirmation. A larger specifically designed randomised controlled trial could be merited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 27%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 9 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 36 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,303,094
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#422
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,177
of 341,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The journal of nutrition, health & aging
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.