↓ Skip to main content

Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
33 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automatic Evidence Retrieval for Systematic Reviews
Published in
Journal of Medical Internet Research, October 2014
DOI 10.2196/jmir.3369
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Snowballing involves recursively pursuing relevant references cited in the retrieved literature and adding them to the search results. Snowballing is an alternative approach to discover additional evidence that was not retrieved through conventional search. Snowballing's effectiveness makes it best practice in systematic reviews despite being time-consuming and tedious.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 145 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 51 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 16%
Computer Science 14 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Engineering 9 6%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 55 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,982,252
of 34,394,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#1,453
of 10,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,050
of 298,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Internet Research
#17
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,394,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.