↓ Skip to main content

Social Dominance Orientation Predicts Heterosexual Men’s Adverse Reactions to Romantic Rejection

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Social Dominance Orientation Predicts Heterosexual Men’s Adverse Reactions to Romantic Rejection
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0348-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashleigh J. Kelly, Shelli L. Dubbs, Fiona Kate Barlow

Abstract

We examined the role of social dominance orientation (SDO) as a predictor of men's reactions to romantic rejection and attitudes toward female sexuality. In Study 1 (n = 158), we found that men who scored higher in SDO were more likely to blame women for romantic rejection, and report having responded to women's past rejection with persistence and manipulation (e.g., convincing her to "give him another chance"), as well as with aggression and threats of violence. In Study 2 (n = 398), we replicated these findings, and further found that men higher in SDO were more likely to endorse rape myths (e.g., believing that sometimes a woman's barriers need to be "broken down" in order to attain sex), and to want to lower the legal age of sexual consent in women. Two mediators explained this relationship, hostile sexism and the belief that insubordinate women need to be disciplined. Practical and theoretical implications are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 21%
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 42 55%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,149,984
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#592
of 3,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,055
of 231,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#5
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.