↓ Skip to main content

Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
578 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
418 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Capturing momentary, self-report data: A proposal for reporting guidelines
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2002
DOI 10.1207/s15324796abm2403_09
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arthur A. Stone, Saul Shiffman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 418 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
United Kingdom 8 2%
France 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 389 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 22%
Researcher 63 15%
Student > Master 61 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Student > Bachelor 33 8%
Other 65 16%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 154 37%
Social Sciences 42 10%
Computer Science 36 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Other 50 12%
Unknown 97 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2013.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#803
of 1,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,591
of 49,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.