| Title |
Colorectal cancer incidence in path_MLH1 carriers subjected to different follow-up protocols: a Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13053-017-0078-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toni Seppälä, Kirsi Pylvänäinen, Dafydd Gareth Evans, Heikki Järvinen, Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo, Inge Bernstein, Elke Holinski-Feder, Paola Sala, Annika Lindblom, Finlay Macrae, Ignacio Blanco, Rolf Sijmons, Jacqueline Jeffries, Hans Vasen, John Burn, Sigve Nakken, Eivind Hovig, Einar Andreas Rødland, Kukatharmini Tharmaratnam, Wouter H. de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel, James Hill, Juul Wijnen, Mark Jenkins, Maurizio Genuardi, Kate Green, Fiona Lalloo, Lone Sunde, Miriam Mints, Lucio Bertario, Marta Pineda, Matilde Navarro, Monika Morak, Ian M. Frayling, John-Paul Plazzer, Julian R. Sampson, Gabriel Capella, Gabriela Möslein, Jukka-Pekka Mecklin, Pål Møller, in collaboration with The Mallorca Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 3 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,227,357
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#24
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,382
of 336,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.