↓ Skip to main content

The Expression Changes of Vacuolar Protein Sorting 4B (VPS4B) Following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion (MCAO) in Adult Rats Brain Hippocampus

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
The Expression Changes of Vacuolar Protein Sorting 4B (VPS4B) Following Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion (MCAO) in Adult Rats Brain Hippocampus
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10571-013-9989-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gang Cui, Yunfeng Wang, Shanshan Yu, Lixiang Yang, Bing Li, Wei Wang, Peng Zhou, Jiang Wu, Ting Lu, Dongjian Chen

Abstract

Vacuolar protein sorting 4 (VPS4), is a member of ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities protein family. VPS4 is composed of VPS4A and VPS4B, VPS4B plays an important role in the lysosomal degradation pathway, intracellular protein trafficking, virus budding and abscission of cytokinesis. However, information regarding its distribution and possible function in the central nervous system is limited. Therefore, we performed a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in adult rats and detected the dynamic changes of VPS4B in hippocampus CA1 subregion. We found that the VPS4B expression was increased strongly after MCAO and reached the peak after 3 days. VPS4B mainly located in the cytoplasm of neurons, but not astrocytes and microglia. Moreover, there was a concomitant up-regulation of active caspase-3. In vitro studies indicated that the up-regulation of VPS4B may be involved in oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced PC12 cell death. And knock-down of VPS4B in cultured differentiated PC12 cells by siRNA showed that VPS4B promoted the expression of active caspase-3. Collectively, all these results and MTT assay suggested that the up-regulation of VPS4B played an important role in the pathophysiology after MCAO, and further research is needed to have a good understanding of its function and mechanism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Master 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Neuroscience 2 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2014.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#849
of 1,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,500
of 208,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.