↓ Skip to main content

Differential gene regulatory networks in development and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Differential gene regulatory networks in development and disease
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00018-017-2679-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arun J. Singh, Stephen A. Ramsey, Theresa M. Filtz, Chrissa Kioussi

Abstract

Gene regulatory networks, in which differential expression of regulator genes induce differential expression of their target genes, underlie diverse biological processes such as embryonic development, organ formation and disease pathogenesis. An archetypical systems biology approach to mapping these networks involves the combined application of (1) high-throughput sequencing-based transcriptome profiling (RNA-seq) of biopsies under diverse network perturbations and (2) network inference based on gene-gene expression correlation analysis. The comparative analysis of such correlation networks across cell types or states, differential correlation network analysis, can identify specific molecular signatures and functional modules that underlie the state transition or have context-specific function. Here, we review the basic concepts of network biology and correlation network inference, and the prevailing methods for differential analysis of correlation networks. We discuss applications of gene expression network analysis in the context of embryonic development, cancer, and congenital diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 99 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Computer Science 7 7%
Engineering 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 26 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,096,792
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#507
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,842
of 325,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#15
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.