↓ Skip to main content

Biodegradation of tetracycline antibiotics in A/O moving-bed biofilm reactor systems

Overview of attention for article published in Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 604)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Biodegradation of tetracycline antibiotics in A/O moving-bed biofilm reactor systems
Published in
Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00449-017-1842-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Han-Yu Chen, Yong-De Liu, Bin Dong

Abstract

An anaerobic/aerobic moving-bed biofilm (A/O-MBBR) reactor system was constructed, and the treatment efficiency of aqueous antibiotics in wastewater was investigated. The effects of antibiotics on the microbial communities in the A/O-MBBR were also investigated. Under the optimized reaction conditions, removal of tetracycline antibiotics (TCs) was studied in a series of experiments. When a low concentration of tetracycline (TC) was added to the reactor system, high removal efficiency of conventional pollutants (TC concentration decreased from 10 turn to 2.8 μg L(-1)) was achieved. When mixed TCs (50 μg L(-1)) were added to the system, the removal efficiencies of chlortetracycline (CTC), TC and oxytetracycline (OTC) reached 52.03, 41.79, and 38.42%, respectively. TC degradation was decreased to 21.16% when the antibiotic concentration was 500 μg L(-1); exposure to this TC concentration destroyed the community structure of the activated sludge bacteria in the reactor. The products of the biodegradation analysis revealed the possible degradation pathways functioning in the experimental A/O-MBBRs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 17%
Engineering 7 13%
Chemical Engineering 4 7%
Chemistry 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 26 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2017.
All research outputs
#4,741,859
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#43
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,178
of 333,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them