↓ Skip to main content

A Review of Peer-Mediated Social Interaction Interventions for Students with Autism in Inclusive Settings

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
A Review of Peer-Mediated Social Interaction Interventions for Students with Autism in Inclusive Settings
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2264-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laci Watkins, Mark O’Reilly, Michelle Kuhn, Cindy Gevarter, Giulio E. Lancioni, Jeff Sigafoos, Russell Lang

Abstract

This review addresses the use of peer-mediated interventions (PMI) to improve the social interaction skills of students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in inclusive settings. The purpose of this review is to (a) identify the characteristics and components of peer-mediated social interaction interventions, (b) evaluate the effectiveness of PMI by offering an analysis of intervention results and research design, and (c) suggest directions for future research. Overall, results suggest that PMI is a promising treatment for increasing social interaction in children, adolescents, and young adults with ASD in inclusive settings, with positive generalization, maintenance, and social validity outcomes. Findings also suggest that participant characteristics and the type of social deficit an individual exhibits are important considerations when choosing the optimal configuration of PMI strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 358 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 69 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 9%
Student > Bachelor 33 9%
Researcher 23 6%
Other 56 16%
Unknown 98 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 109 30%
Social Sciences 68 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 4%
Arts and Humanities 15 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 2%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 107 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#14,723,294
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,616
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,999
of 256,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#63
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.