↓ Skip to main content

Food for creativity: tyrosine promotes deep thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,016)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
16 X users
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
Title
Food for creativity: tyrosine promotes deep thinking
Published in
Psychological Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00426-014-0610-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenza S. Colzato, Annelies M. de Haan, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

Anecdotal evidence suggests that creative people sometimes use food to overcome mental blocks and lack of inspiration, but empirical support for this possibility is still lacking. In this study, we investigated whether creativity in convergent- and divergent-thinking tasks is promoted by the food supplement L-Tyrosine (TYR)-a biochemical precursor of dopamine, which is assumed to drive cognitive control and creativity. We found no evidence for an impact of TYR on divergent thinking ("brainstorming") but it did promote convergent ("deep") thinking. As convergent thinking arguably requires more cognitive top-down control, this finding suggests that TYR can facilitate control-hungry creative operations. Hence, the food we eat may affect the way we think.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 130 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 19%
Student > Bachelor 23 17%
Student > Master 20 15%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 35%
Neuroscience 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 34 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2023.
All research outputs
#576,140
of 25,054,308 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#22
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,849
of 258,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,054,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.