↓ Skip to main content

Status of tick distribution in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Status of tick distribution in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan
Published in
Parasitology Research, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00436-007-0684-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Srikant Ghosh, Gyan Chand Bansal, Suresh Chandra Gupta, Debdatta Ray, Muhammad Qasim Khan, Hamid Irshad, Md. Shahiduzzaman, Ulrike Seitzer, Jabbar S. Ahmed

Abstract

On a global basis, ticks transmit a greater variety of pathogenic microorganisms, protozoa, rickettsiae, spirochaets, and viruses than any other arthropods and are among the most important vectors of diseases affecting livestock, humans, and companion animals. Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBDs) affect 80% of the world cattle population and are widely distributed throughout the world, particularly in tropical and subtropical countries including India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh. Ticks and tick-transmitted infections have coevolved with various wild animal hosts, which constitute the reservoir hosts for ticks and tick-borne pathogens of livestock, pets, and humans. In this region, the livestock sector is suffering from a number of disease problems caused by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and parasites. Among the parasitological problems, the damage caused by TTBDs is considered very high, and the control of TTBDs has been given priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 32%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#6,780,313
of 22,765,347 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#505
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,479
of 69,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,765,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.