↓ Skip to main content

自律神経疾患の治療の進歩

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Therapeutics, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 108)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
自律神経疾患の治療の進歩
Published in
Neurological Therapeutics, February 2017
DOI 10.15082/jsnt.33.4_542
Authors

山元 敏正

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,942,734
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Therapeutics
#21
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,103
of 425,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Therapeutics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.