↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and costs of treating uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and costs of treating uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension in primary care: a cross-sectional analysis
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x681817
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Sheppard, Kate Fletcher, Richard J McManus, Jonathan Mant

Abstract

Treatment for uncomplicated stage 1 hypertension is recommended in most international guidelines but there is little evidence to indicate that therapy is beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 26 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,522,675
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,217
of 4,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,327
of 257,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#25
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.